CJEU rules on counteraction by conceptual differences in trade mark law, but leaves much to be resolved - The IPKat
CITMA - Making room for Messi
Highly Reputable Trade Marks: Puma SE v EUIPO, A Case Study - Lexology
Nestlé wins in trademark dispute ONE: Renewed EUIPO examination flawed - Legal Patent
The correct approach to comparison of signs in EU trade mark law - Lexology
Comparison of signs in EU trade mark law
General Court Annuls EUIPO'S Refusal To Register Figurative Mark 'Chiara Ferragni' As EU Trade Mark - Intellectual Property - European Union
Relationship between trade marks and designs Dr Jur
Similarity of Trademarks: Huawei analyses pronouncation of European languages
Guerlain made up following General Court decision - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Similarity of signs of a Union figurative mark - earlier mark unsuccessful - Legal Patent
When appealing bears fruit: Pear Technologies v EUIPO – Apple | ILN IP Insider
Case T-44/20 Chanel SAS v EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner
CITMA - Goodbye HelloFruity
Are you XKING kidding me? Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM system - The IPKat
Chanel's logo and interlocking 3s (or Ss) – same overall impression? - Kluwer Trademark Blog
The EU General Court on relative grounds for refusal: the Chanel judgment - The IPKat
The Likelihood Of Confusion In The European Union Trade Mark Opposition Procedure – Part II - Intellectual Property - European Union
Pollini v. Collini: Omission of review of trademark use - Legal Patent
Is Article 8(3) EUTMR applicable only to identical marks? The General Court pitches in, but it is not the last word yet. - Kluwer Trademark Blog
CITMA - BoA isn't backed up
Similarity of Union figurative marks - word element decisive - Legal Patent
NORWAY: District Court in non-EU country aiming with EUIPO Guidelines - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Judgment in Cases T-85/16 and T-629/16 Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner
